Ticket #48 (closed defect: fixed)

Opened 2 years ago

Last modified 2 years ago

Fix SBBot

Reported by: Maverick Assigned to:
Priority: high Component: Bots - Other
Version: Latest version from repository Severity: minor
Keywords: Cc:

Description

The sbbot got deleted because it was thought it wasn't used. (changeset:1385) Left_Eye today requested the bot so I had to recover it.

This bot still gives the usual compilation errors because of a few missing files. These files need to be recreated or the referring files need to be changed.

Attachments

Change History

04/17/07 14:02:15 changed by Maverick

  • severity changed from critical to minor.

04/17/07 15:46:21 changed by anonymous

I can't remember what the differences are with SBBot vs. Strikeballbot, the latter of which I was requisitioned to code but which was never used — maybe due to lack of testing, some sort of major bug, etc. The structuring was all right, though.

From what I remember none of the original code was used for the second bot, so it just went to waste. Perhaps if Strikeballbot will never be used it should be removed?

04/17/07 23:55:11 changed by Maverick

  • summary changed from Fix Strikeballbot (SBBot) to Fix SBBot.

(follow-up: ↓ 5 ) 04/19/07 00:33:55 changed by Maverick

  • status changed from new to closed.
  • resolution set to fixed.

Fixed by deleting an unused file which caused compilation errors. See changeset:1434 .

As Left_Eye stated above either SBBot or strikeballbot should be removed.

(in reply to: ↑ 4 ; follow-up: ↓ 6 ) 04/20/07 15:20:54 changed by dugwyler

Replying to Maverick:

Fixed by deleting an unused file which caused compilation errors. See changeset:1434 . As Left_Eye stated above either SBBot or strikeballbot should be removed.

As this sort of thing bothers me, I have to ask: where did Left_Eye state this? I hate being redundant, so I apologize if this was the case. That is, of course I would not have asked.

(in reply to: ↑ 5 ) 04/21/07 05:21:47 changed by Maverick

Replying to dugwyler:

where did Left_Eye state this?

We now have a /bots/SBBot and a /bots/strikeballbot. These bots serve the same purpose: hosting strikeball.

Now Left_Eye (in the 2nd comment, posted as anynomous) responds to this problem (having SBBot and strikeballbot) the following:

I can't remember what the differences are with SBBot vs. Strikeballbot, the latter of which I was requisitioned to code but which was never used — maybe due to lack of testing, some sort of major bug, etc. The structuring was all right, though.

From what I remember none of the original code was used for the second bot, so it just went to waste. Perhaps if Strikeballbot will never be used it should be removed?

04/21/07 06:07:27 changed by dugwyler

Ah! Sorry, I forgot to log in. That anonymous comment was actually me (dugwyler). I was wondering what others thought about the idea. It would be a shame to remove either, as both are fairly complex, but it probably needs to be done.

04/21/07 12:04:45 changed by Maverick

Oh right, I assumed it was Left_Eye :/ Yes one of the two should be removed.

Add/Change #48 (Fix SBBot)




Change Properties
Action